The High-touch Legal Services® Blog…for Startups!
© 2009-2021 Dana H. Shultz
This post is based on a question that I answered on OnStartups. Q. I’m in the process of closing a deal with a new client, and the only sticking point is the choice of applicable law. I am located in state A, the client in state B. My contract says it will be governed by the law of state A. The client wants to change this to New York. Why? Would doing so open my company up to any unintended side effects/liabilities (e.g., taxes)?
Dana Shultz is a recently retired lawyer located in Northern California's San Francisco Bay Area (in the East Bay, near Oakland) who has in-depth knowledge of law, business, technology, and the needs of startup and early-stage companies.
As a lawyer, Dana dispensed as much business advice as legal advice. Accordingly, although he no longer is practicing law, Dana occasionally provides consulting services to owners and managers of small businesses.
If you need legal representation, Dana provides referrals to experienced business lawyers.
For more information about Dana and the legal services that he previously provided, please go to the About Dana Shultz page and the Legal Services page.
+1 510-326-2123
dana [at] danashultz [dot] com
Skype: dana.h.shultz
This blog does not constitute legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. If you need legal advice, please contact a lawyer directly.
This website is a "communication" as that term is defined in Rule of Professional Conduct 1-400(A) (now subject to Chapter 7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct that took effect on November 1, 2018).