This post is about a legal concept, constructive notice.
Its origin is a Quora answer that I provided. Please see If nobody reads the Terms of Service then how can they legally be acceptable as a disclaimer?
Requiring that Terms Be Read is Impracticable
There was an assumption inherent in the Quora question: Terms of service should be binding only if the user has read them.
However, if the law simply said “unread terms of service have no effect,” then no one would read anyone else’s terms. As a result, no one’s terms would have any effect or would be enforceable!
This would be counterproductive. Creating any binding terms – even those that are reasonable and readily acceptable – would become impossible.
Constructive Notice Suffices
So the law, instead, says something along the line of the following:
If a service provider makes its terms of service sufficiently conspicuous and a user chooses to ignore those terms, then that is the user’s problem, rather than the service provider’s.
This is called constructive notice. It suffices to bind users to the provider’s terms when the user has notice of those terms. In my opinion, such law is appropriate.
For further discussion of this issue, please see
Dana H. Shultz, Attorney at Law +1 510-547-0545 dana [at] danashultz [dot] com
This blog does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you need legal advice, please contact a lawyer directly.