This post discusses my surprise at finding that there apparently is no requirement that corporate officers be human beings.
My answer to a Quora question is the basis for this post. Please see Could an A.I. create a company and do all the functions typical of another company?
I was about to write an answer stating that corporate officers be natural persons (human beings). But with a bit of research, I found that apparently is not the case!
Corporate Directors Must be Human Beings…
Corporate directors must be human beings (the legal term is “natural persons”). See, e.g.,
The board of directors of a corporation shall consist of 1 or more members, each of whom shall be a natural person.
“Directors” means natural persons designated in the articles
as such or elected by the incorporators and natural persons
designated, elected or appointed by any other name or title to act as
directors, and their successors.
This is a bit of a surprise for some of my international clients. In many countries, a legal entity can have a seat a corporate board of directors (or its equivalent in the relevant country). However, that is not permitted in the U.S.
…But Not So for Corporate Officers
Much to my surprise (I had not thought about this issue before), I found no requirement that corporate officers be human beings.
Consider Delaware General Corporation Law Section 142(a). It refers to an officer being a “person,” but not a “natural person.”
Similarly, California Corporations Code Section 312(a) refers to an officer being a “person,” but not a “natural person.”
So, although I have never seen this, a legal entity, represented by one of its authorized officers, could serve as an officer of a corporation.
Dana H. Shultz, Attorney at Law +1 510-547-0545 dana [at] danashultz [dot] com
This blog does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you need legal advice, please contact a lawyer directly.